 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paid Links - Good or bad - a UK SEO perspective</title>
	<link>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/</link>
	<description>Not just another UK SEO blog but one with more about SEO, PPC and Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Young</title>
		<link>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23895</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23895</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the post Andrew (nice site by the way)

The issue of links will imo always be a sticky subject whilst people are obtaining links for promotional purposes only, whether they be free, paid or recipricol 

(PS they have clamped down on paid and recipricol - no prizes for guessing whats next)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Andrew (nice site by the way)</p>
<p>The issue of links will imo always be a sticky subject whilst people are obtaining links for promotional purposes only, whether they be free, paid or recipricol </p>
<p>(PS they have clamped down on paid and recipricol - no prizes for guessing whats next)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23894</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23894</guid>
					<description>Interesting thoughts and problem always for small organisations is keeping ahead of the game with a small budget. We have looked but not gone ahead because our experience so far has been relevant links and content work for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts and problem always for small organisations is keeping ahead of the game with a small budget. We have looked but not gone ahead because our experience so far has been relevant links and content work for us.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paid Links - Good or bad - a UK SEO perspective part III</title>
		<link>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23837</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23837</guid>
					<description>[...] Paid Links - Good or Bad - a UK SEO perspective [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Paid Links - Good or Bad - a UK SEO perspective [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paid Links - a UK SEO perspective Part II.5</title>
		<link>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23793</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23793</guid>
					<description>[...] Paid Links - Good or bad - a UK SEO perspective  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Paid Links - Good or bad - a UK SEO perspective  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paid Links - a UK SEO perspective Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23792</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-gain.co.uk/blog/paid-links-good-or-bad-a-uk-seo-perspective/2007/08/24/#comment-23792</guid>
					<description>[...] Paid links aren&#8217;t bad - over-reliance on paid links is bad, however my concern with the approach of such radical action is it merely serves to focus hardcore OVER-SEO activity elsewhere, like recipricol linkage before it. I personally understand what both John and Andrew say about content, however the mere fact Google have said Content is good will no doubt result in millions of pages of so-called unique content being produced thus diluting both the value and quality of content, and I would suggest we may find ourselves in a similar situation regarding content generation in the future. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Paid links aren&#8217;t bad - over-reliance on paid links is bad, however my concern with the approach of such radical action is it merely serves to focus hardcore OVER-SEO activity elsewhere, like recipricol linkage before it. I personally understand what both John and Andrew say about content, however the mere fact Google have said Content is good will no doubt result in millions of pages of so-called unique content being produced thus diluting both the value and quality of content, and I would suggest we may find ourselves in a similar situation regarding content generation in the future. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
